How to Choose a Business Idea That Actually Works

Every successful business begins with an idea, but not every idea becomes a successful business. The difference between entrepreneurs who build thriving companies and those who struggle through failed ventures often comes down to one critical factor: choosing the right business idea from the start.

The graveyard of failed businesses is filled with ideas that seemed brilliant in theory but collapsed in practice—products nobody wanted, services that couldn't turn a profit, markets that didn't exist, or execution that proved impossible. Meanwhile, seemingly mundane ideas generate millions because they solve real problems for people willing to pay.

Choosing a business idea isn't about finding the most innovative, disruptive, or exciting concept. It's about systematically evaluating opportunities to find one that aligns with market realities, your capabilities, and economic viability. This guide provides a comprehensive framework for making that choice intelligently.

What Makes a Business Idea "Work"?

Before diving into selection methods, we must define what "works" actually means. A viable business idea has several fundamental characteristics that distinguish it from attractive fantasies.

Solves a Real Problem - Working business ideas address genuine problems, needs, or desires that people experience intensely enough to pay for solutions. The issue must be real, not imagined. Entrepreneurs often fall in love with solutions, searching for problems, building products nobody asked for, and nobody needs.

Has Paying Customers - Ideas work when people actually pay money, not just express interest or say they "might" buy. The history of entrepreneurship is filled with products that tested well in surveys but failed commercially because stated interest doesn't equal purchase intent.

Generates Sustainable Profit - Revenue without profit creates businesses that consume cash rather than develop it. Working ideas have unit economics that make sense—the lifetime value of customers exceeds acquisition costs with enough margin left over to cover operations and generate returns.

Fits Your Capabilities - Brilliant ideas that require capabilities you don't have and can't acquire don't work for you, even if they might work for someone else. Working ideas align with your skills, knowledge, resources, network, and capacity to execute.

Has Market Timing Right - Too early and you educate the market for competitors who enter when adoption accelerates. Too late, and you face entrenched competitors with superior resources. Working ideas hit the market at the right point in their evolution.

Is Legally and Practically Feasible - Some ideas work on paper but face insurmountable regulatory barriers, technical impossibilities, or practical constraints that prevent execution. Working ideas can actually be implemented within real-world constraints.

Offers Defensible Advantages - Without some form of competitive advantage—unique expertise, proprietary technology, exclusive relationships, brand, network effects, or operational excellence—your business becomes commoditized and unprofitable as competition intensifies.

A working business idea doesn't need every advantage, but it must clear minimum thresholds across these dimensions. The selection process is about systematically evaluating potential ideas against these criteria.

The Business Idea Selection Framework

Rather than waiting for inspiration to strike or jumping on trending opportunities, use this systematic framework to identify and evaluate business ideas methodically.

Step 1: Start With Self-Assessment

The right business idea for you depends on who you are—your skills, interests, resources, and constraints. Beginning with an honest self-assessment helps you avoid pursuing ideas that don't align with your reality.

Inventory Your Skills and Expertise - List everything you know how to do professionally. Include technical skills, domain knowledge, soft skills, and specialized expertise. A software engineer has different viable business options than a graphic designer or accountant. Your skill set determines which businesses you can execute effectively and which require expensive learning curves or hiring.

Identify Your Genuine Interests - Distinguish between what sounds interesting and what genuinely sustains your attention over the long term. Starting a business requires sustained effort over years—if you're not authentically interested in the domain, you'll burn out before achieving success. Passion isn't everything, but complete indifference guarantees misery.

Assess Your Resources - Catalog available resources: capital you can invest, time you can dedicate, equipment you own, space you have access to, and relationships you can leverage. Resource constraints eliminate specific business models while making others more viable. Someone with $5,000 and a full-time job faces different options than someone with $500,000 and full availability.

Understand Your Risk Tolerance: Honestly assess how much risk you can handle, both financially and emotionally. Some business ideas require betting everything on uncertain outcomes. Others allow gradual, lower-risk entry. Neither approach is wrong, but they must match your risk tolerance and life circumstances.

Recognize Your Constraints - Identify limitations such as geographic location, family responsibilities, health considerations, visa restrictions, or other factors that constrain your options. Constraints aren't excuses for inaction—they're realities that shape which ideas are viable for you specifically.

Define Your Goals - Clarify what you want from a business: financial independence, flexibility, impact, creative expression, wealth accumulation, or something else. Different goals suit different business models. A lifestyle business that provides $200,000 annually with minimal stress differs fundamentally from a venture-backed startup aiming for a billion-dollar valuation.

This self-assessment sets boundaries for finding ideas. Rather than limiting creativity, boundaries provide focus, making the search more productive.

Step 2: Generate a Wide Range of Ideas

With self-understanding established, generate multiple business ideas rather than committing prematurely to the first promising concept.

Problem-Based Ideation - List problems you've personally experienced or observed others experiencing. Focus on frustrations, inefficiencies, unmet needs, and situations where people complain or work around inadequate solutions. The best business ideas often come from entrepreneurs scratching their own itch—building solutions to problems they've personally felt.

Skill-Based Ideation: Start with your strongest skills and brainstorm businesses that leverage them. If you're exceptional at data analysis, what companies need that capability? If you understand construction deeply, what problems exist in that industry? Skill-based ideas benefit from day-one expertise rather than requiring years of learning.

Trend Analysis: Examine emerging trends—technological, demographic, regulatory, and cultural—and brainstorm businesses aligned with them. The rise of remote work created opportunities for home office furniture, productivity software, and virtual team-building services. Identify where the world is going and position ahead of the curve.

Model Adaptation: Review successful businesses in one market, industry, or geography and assess whether similar models could work in different contexts. Can the subscription box model that works for cosmetics work for pet supplies? Can the marketplace model be successful in arranging parking space assignments? Adaptation isn't copying—it's pattern recognition.

Combination and Innovation - Combine existing concepts in novel ways. Airbnb combined lodging with peer-to-peer marketplaces. DoorDash combined food delivery with gig economy labor. Many breakthrough businesses emerge from clever combinations of existing elements rather than entirely new inventions.

Gap Analysis - Examine markets you understand and identify gaps—customer segments underserved, price points without offerings, features missing from existing products, or geographic areas lacking services. Gaps represent opportunities for businesses to fill.

Personal Network Mining: Ask friends, family, former colleagues, and acquaintances which problems frustrate them. Listen for recurring themes. When multiple unconnected people complain about the same issue, you've potentially identified a real problem worth solving.

Generate at least 20-30 ideas during this phase. Most won't survive deeper analysis, but a broad exploration increases the likelihood of finding genuinely viable opportunities hidden among obvious but flawed concepts.

Step 3: Evaluate Market Demand

Ideas mean nothing without customers. Rigorously evaluate whether real market demand exists for each potential business idea.

Research Market Size - Estimate the total addressable market (TAM), serviceable addressable market (SAM), and serviceable obtainable market (SOM). TAM represents everyone who could theoretically use the product. SAM represents the segment you can realistically serve. SOM represents what you could capture in the near term. Ideas with insufficient market size can't support sustainable businesses regardless of execution quality.

Validate Problem Intensity: Determine how strongly people want solutions. Nice-to-have problems generate weak demand. Must-have problems create an urgent willingness to pay. Interview potential customers—not to pitch your solution but to understand their problems. Do they currently spend time or money on solving this problem? Do they rate it as a top priority? Do they express genuine pain when discussing it?

Analyze Search Volume - Use tools like Google Keyword Planner, Ahrefs, or SEMrush to research search volumes for keywords related to your business idea. Thousands of monthly searches for "how to [solve problem you're addressing]" indicate genuine demand. Zero searches suggest nobody cares about the problem.

Study Existing Solutions - Examine current solutions—both direct competitors and indirect alternatives. Existing competitors prove market demand but raise questions about differentiation. No competitors may indicate opportunity or signal that no viable market exists. Dig deeper: Why aren't there competitors? Is it because the market is nascent, or because innovative entrepreneurs tried and failed?

Test With Landing Pages - Create simple landing pages describing your product and drive traffic through ads or social media. Track conversion rates for email sign-ups or pre-orders. This validates whether people move beyond passive interest to active commitment. Conversion rates reveal whether you've identified real demand or wishful thinking.

Conduct Customer Interviews: Speak with 20-30 potential customers individually. Ask about their problems, current solutions, willingness to pay, and decision-making processes. These conversations reveal market realities that surveys and research miss. Listen more than you talk; genuine discovery requires hearing what customers say, not pitching your idea.

Analyze Willingness to Pay—Understanding whether people will pay—and how much they will pay—is more important than confirming they have the problem. Ask interview subjects what they currently pay for alternatives or what they'd pay for an ideal solution. Price sensitivity determines whether viable business models exist.

Step 4: Assess Competition and Differentiation

Competition isn't inherently bad—it validates market demand. But you must understand competitive dynamics and identify how you'll differentiate.

Map the Competitive Landscape - Identify all direct and indirect competitors. Direct competitors offer similar solutions to the same problem. Indirect competitors address the same need in different ways. A company building a meal kit delivery service competes directly with other meal kit services and indirectly with restaurants, grocery stores, and frozen meals.

Analyze Competitor Strengths and Weaknesses - Study what competitors do well and poorly. Read customer reviews religiously—they reveal pain points with existing solutions that represent your opportunities. Where do competitors fail? What do customers wish existed? These gaps show where differentiation is possible.

Determine Barriers to Entry: Identify what prevents new competitors from entering the market easily. Low barriers mean you'll face constant competition. High barriers to entry protect existing players but may also prevent your entry. Assess whether you can overcome entry barriers and whether those barriers will protect you once established.

Identify Your Unique Advantage - Articulate specifically why customers should choose you over alternatives. "Better quality" and "better service" are vague and unconvincing. Specific advantages like "30-minute response time versus industry-standard 24 hours" or "designed specifically for freelancers while competitors focus on enterprises" create clear differentiation.

Evaluate Competitive Response - Consider how established competitors might respond to your entry. Companies with massive resources, established customer relationships, and brand recognition can crush new entrants easily if threatened. Look for opportunities to develop footholds before competitors notice, or in areas where competitive response is unlikely or slow.

Assess Winner-Take-All Dynamics: Some markets reward scale with network effects or economies of scale, creating winner-take-all outcomes. Social networks, marketplaces, and infrastructure businesses often exhibit these dynamics. Entering such markets late or undercapitalized is usually futile. Other markets remain fragmented indefinitely, supporting many profitable competitors.

Step 5: Evaluate Economic Viability

An idea might solve real problems and face manageable competition, but still fail economically. Rigorously assess whether the business model can generate sustainable profit.

Calculate Unit Economics - Determine profit per customer: revenue per customer minus cost to acquire and serve that customer. Positive unit economics are essential—if you lose money on each customer, you can't make it up on volume. Model different scenarios: best case, worst case, and most likely case. What must be true for unit economics to work?

Estimate Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) - Research how much competitors spend on marketing and sales. Calculate what you'll need to spend to acquire customers through various channels, including paid advertising, content marketing, sales teams, and partnerships. CAC determines whether customer lifetime value can exceed acquisition costs with adequate margins.

Project Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) - Estimate how much revenue each customer generates over their entire relationship with your business. For subscription businesses, this involves retention rates and monthly recurring revenue. For transaction-based companies, this includes repeat purchase frequency and average order value. The LTV: CAC ratio should be at least 3:1 for healthy companies.

Model Operating Expenses - List all costs: rent, salaries, software, manufacturing, inventory, insurance, legal, accounting, and more. Entrepreneurs consistently underestimate operating expenses. Build detailed models that show the monthly burn rate and the point at which the business becomes cash-flow positive.

Identify Revenue Milestones - Determine how much revenue is required to reach key milestones: break-even, replace your current income, profitability, and scale. Assess how many customers at what price points generate those revenue levels. Do the numbers seem achievable, or do they require unrealistic growth rates or market share?

Understand Capital Requirements: Calculate the capital you need to achieve profitability. Some businesses are capital-light and bootstrap easily. Others require significant upfront investment in inventory, equipment, or customer acquisition before generating returns. Ensure capital requirements align with your resources or funding capacity.

Assess Scalability - Evaluate whether the business can grow without proportional cost increases. Software businesses scale beautifully—adding customers requires minimal incremental cost. Service businesses scale poorly—more customers require more employees. Understand scalability implications for long-term profitability.

Step 6: Evaluate Personal Fit and Execution Capability

Even economically viable ideas in strong markets fail if you can't execute them effectively. Assess honestly whether you can build this specific business.

Match Skills to Requirements - List skills required for business success and compare against your capabilities. Can you acquire missing abilities through learning, hiring, or partnerships? If the business requires deep technical expertise you lack and can't obtain, it's a mistake regardless of the market opportunity.

Assess Time Requirements - Estimate the time commitment, especially in the early stages. Can you dedicate that time, given your current circumstances? Underestimating required time is among the most common entrepreneurial mistakes. Part-time businesses rarely compete effectively against full-time competitors.

Evaluate Passion and Sustainability - Will you still care about this business in three years? Five years? Ten years? Starting a business is relatively easy; sustaining one through inevitable challenges requires a genuine interest in the domain. If you're pursuing an opportunity purely for money, you'll likely quit when difficulties arise.

Consider Lifestyle Implications - Different businesses create different lifestyles. Restaurants require physical presence. E-commerce allows location independence. Consulting offers flexibility but trades time for money. Manufacturing demands operational management. Choose a business model that creates the lifestyle you actually want, not one that sounds appealing in theory.

Assess Risk Appropriateness: Match your business risk level to your life circumstances. Taking huge risks makes sense for young people with no dependents and high earnings potential. It's less appropriate for people supporting families near retirement. Neither is wrong, but they're different situations requiring different approaches.

Step 7: Test Before Fully Committing

Before investing significant resources, validate assumptions through low-cost testing.

Create Minimum Viable Products (MVPs): build the simplest version that demonstrates core value and enables customer feedback. MVPs shouldn't be polished—they should be functional enough to validate whether people will actually use and pay for the solution. A landing page, a prototype, or a manual delivery of a future automated service all qualify as an MVP.

Run Small-Scale Pilots - Test business concepts with limited scope: small customer groups, single geographic markets, or narrow product ranges. Pilots reveal operational realities and customer responses without requiring full-scale investment. Many issues apparent in pilots would become catastrophic at scale.

Validate with Pre-Sales: Try selling before building. If you can't persuade people to commit when describing the product, you probably can't sell it after creating it either. Pre-sales demand validation is more reliable than any research. Real money beats stated intentions every time.

Seek Iterative Feedback - Release early, gather feedback, refine, and repeat. Modern business development is iterative. The first version is never perfect. What matters is learning speed—how quickly you incorporate feedback and improve. Businesses that learn faster outcompete those that execute predetermined plans more slowly.

Set Decision Criteria - Before testing, define what results would indicate success versus failure. How many customers? What conversion rates? What feedback? Clear criteria prevent motivated reasoning, where you interpret any results as validation. If you don't hit your criteria, you must be willing to pivot or abandon the idea.

Step 8: Make the Final Decision

After systematic evaluation and testing, make an informed choice about which business idea to pursue.

Score and Rank Ideas - Create a scoring system across key dimensions: market size, competition intensity, economic viability, personal fit, required resources, and risk level. Rate each idea objectively. Quantifying subjective assessments reveals which ideas score highest and which are exciting but lack substance.

Seek Outside Perspectives - Present your top ideas to mentors, experienced entrepreneurs, or advisors in relevant industries. Fresh perspectives often spot issues you've missed or see opportunities you've overlooked. Beware of feedback from friends and family who want to be supportive rather than honest.

Trust Your Analysis - If your systematic evaluation points toward an idea that doesn't excite you emotionally, trust the analysis. Excitement fades quickly under entrepreneurial pressure. Sound fundamentals provide sustainable foundations. Conversely, if analysis suggests an exciting idea is fundamentally flawed, don't proceed based on passion alone.

Accept Imperfect Information - You'll never have complete certainty. At some point, you must decide based on available information, accepting that unknowns remain. Paralysis from seeking perfect information is as harmful as recklessness. Make the best decision you can with the information you have, then commit to it.

Commit Fully - Once you've chosen an idea, commit completely. Half-hearted entrepreneurship rarely succeeds. Reserve the right to pivot later if evidence demands it, but initial execution requires full commitment. Hedging by pursuing multiple ideas simultaneously usually means none receive adequate attention.

Common Business Idea Selection Mistakes

Understanding frequent pitfalls helps avoid them.

Choosing Based on Passion Alone - Loving an idea doesn't make it viable. The market doesn't care about your passion—it cares whether you solve problems people will pay to solve. Passion is valuable for sustaining effort but insufficient for ensuring success.

Following Trends Blindly - Jumping on hot trends often means entering markets already saturated with well-funded competitors. By the time trends are apparent, opportunities have usually passed. Contrarianism and early trend identification outperform late-stage trend-following.

Ignoring Personal Limitations - Pursuing businesses requiring capabilities you lack and can't acquire wastes time and money. Honest self-assessment prevents you from chasing opportunities that are not a good fit for you, even if they work for others.

Underestimating Competition - Assuming you can easily outcompete established players usually reflects naivety rather than insight. Incumbents have advantages: existing customers, refined operations, brand recognition, and resources. Differentiation requires more than incremental improvement.

Overestimating Market Size - Entrepreneurs commonly overestimate addressable markets through faulty logic: "If we capture just 1% of this massive market..." But reaching even 1% of large markets is extraordinarily difficult. Realistic market sizing prevents pursuing opportunities that are too small relative to the effort required.

Solving Problems You Imagine vs. Problems That Exist - Building solutions searching for problems almost always fails. Validate that real people experience real problems intensely enough to pay for solutions before building anything.

Copying Without Understanding - Seeing successful businesses and assuming you can replicate them ignores that success often depends on specific contexts, timing, networks, or capabilities. Understand why businesses succeed before attempting to reproduce them.

Analysis Paralysis - Research and planning provide valuable information, but at some point, you must act. Perfect information never exists. Successful entrepreneurs balance analysis with action, learning by doing rather than by studying alone.

Ignoring Unit Economics - Revenue without profit creates businesses that consume cash rather than generate it. Validate that you can profitably acquire and serve customers before scaling.

Mistaking Activity for Progress - Busy work on business plans, logos, and legal structures feels productive, but doesn't validate market demand. Actual progress comes from customer conversations, MVP testing, and actual sales.

Industry-Specific Considerations

Different industries present unique considerations when choosing business ideas.

Technology and Software - High scalability but intense competition. Success requires technical excellence and strong distribution. Winner-take-all dynamics are common. Focus on niche markets where you can dominate rather than competing directly with well-funded players in broad markets.

E-Commerce and Retail - Accessible entry but fierce competition and thin margins. Success requires differentiation beyond price: unique products, exceptional service, or specific audience focus. Inventory management and logistics determine profitability.

Services and Consulting - Lower capital requirements but limited scalability. Revenue is directly tied to your time unless you build teams. Focus on high-value specialized services rather than commoditized offerings. Positioning and reputation drive pricing power.

Food and Hospitality - High capital requirements, thin margins, operational intensity, and regulatory complexity. Success requires exceptional execution, location, and operational efficiency. Passion helps, but doesn't overcome poor locations or inadequate capital.

Healthcare and Medical - Regulatory barriers create both challenges and moats: long sales cycles and complex stakeholder dynamics. Insurance reimbursement models affect viability. Clinical validation requirements slow innovation but protect eventual market positions.

Education and Training - A growing market driven by technology and credentialing gaps. Online delivery enables scalability. Outcomes measurement is increasingly essential—differentiation through specialization or superior pedagogical approaches.

Manufacturing and Physical Products - Capital-intensive with complex supply chains and logistics. Economies of scale favor established players. Success requires operational excellence, innovation, or niche dominance. Consider contract manufacturing to reduce capital requirements.

When to Pivot vs. Persevere

After choosing and launching a business idea, you'll face decisions about whether to pivot to different ideas or persevere through challenges.

Pivot When:

· Customer validation consistently fails despite genuine efforts

· Unit economics prove fundamentally unworkable after testing

· Market timing is clearly wrong (too early or too late)

· Regulatory or technical barriers are insurmountable

· Competition has locked up the market irreversibly

· Your passion and energy for the domain have completely evaporated

Persevere When:

· Core validation is working, but execution needs refinement

· You're making steady progress on key metrics

· Customer feedback is constructive rather than dismissive

· Problems seem difficult but solvable

· You're still learning and improving rapidly

· Market conditions remain favorable or improving

The difference between successful pivoting and quitting is whether you extract and apply lessons. Pivoting with learning accelerates toward success. Abandoning without understanding why you failed repeats mistakes.

The Reality of Choosing Business Ideas

Choosing business ideas isn't a one-time decision. Most entrepreneurs cycle through multiple ideas, some through formal pivots and others through serial entrepreneurship. The skills you develop through systematic idea evaluation compound, making each successive choice better informed than the last.

There is no perfect business idea—only ideas more or less suitable for specific people in specific circumstances at particular times. An idea perfect for one entrepreneur might be disastrous for another. Context matters as much as the idea itself.

The best business ideas often seem dull or obvious to outside observers. World-changing innovation is rare. Most successful businesses solve ordinary problems extraordinarily well. Don't dismiss ideas because they seem mundane—execution quality matters more than novelty.

Successful entrepreneurs balance vision with pragmatism. They dream big but act based on evidence. They're passionate about solving problems but dispassionate about their solutions, and they're willing to pivot when the evidence demands it. They commit fully while remaining intellectually flexible.

Choosing a business idea that actually works requires intellectual honesty, systematic evaluation, and the willingness to follow the evidence, even when it contradicts your hopes. It's more complicated than waiting for inspiration and less dramatic than impulsive leaps. But it dramatically increases your likelihood of building a business that not only launches but also succeeds sustainably.

The framework provided here won't guarantee success—execution still matters enormously, luck plays a role, and circumstances change. But it tilts odds heavily in your favor by ensuring you pursue opportunities with genuine potential rather than attractive fantasies. That distinction makes all the difference.

References

1. Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Business.

2. Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The Startup Owner's Manual: The Step-by-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. K&S Ranch.

3. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons.

4. Thiel, P., & Masters, B. (2014). Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future. Crown Business.

5. Graham, P. (2012). How to get startup ideas. Y Combinator Essays. paulgraham.com.

6. Maurya, A. (2012). Running Lean: Iterate from Plan A to a Plan That Works. O'Reilly Media.

7. Kawasaki, G. (2004). The Art of the Start: The Time-Tested, Battle-Hardened Guide for Anyone Starting Anything. Portfolio.

8. Mullins, J., & Komisar, R. (2009). Getting to Plan B: Breaking Through to a Better Business Model. Harvard Business Press.

9. Fitzpatrick, R. (2013). The Mom Test: How to Talk to Customers & Learn If Your Business Is a Good Idea When Everyone Is Lying to You. Robfitz Ltd.

10. Horowitz, B. (2014). The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers. HarperBusiness.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2015). Blue Ocean Strategy, Expanded Edition: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant. Harvard Business Review Press.

12. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press.

13. McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Strategies for Continuously Creating Opportunity in an Age of Uncertainty. Harvard Business School Press.

14. Gans, J. S., Stern, S., & Wu, J. (2019). Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 40(5), 736-756.

15. Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674-695.

16. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.

17. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243-263.

18. CB Insights. (2024). The Top 12 Reasons Startups Fail. CB Insights Research Reports.

19. Kauffman Foundation. (2023). State of Entrepreneurship Report. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.

20. Harvard Business Review. (2023). Why Startups Fail: A New Roadmap for Entrepreneurial Success. Harvard Business School Publishing.