Operational Planning Guide | How to Execute Strategy Successfully Step-by-Step

Related Articles

1. How to Develop Business Strategy

2. Strategic Planning

3. Tactical Planning

Operational planning is the bridge between strategic vision and daily execution—the detailed roadmap that transforms ambitious goals into actionable tasks. While strategic planning asks "where do we want to go?" operational planning answers "how exactly will we get there?" Organizations that excel at operational planning consistently outperform competitors, executing strategies efficiently while adapting to changing circumstances.

What Is Operational Planning?

Operational planning is the process of defining the specific actions, resources, timelines, and responsibilities required to achieve strategic objectives within a specified period, typically one year or less. It translates high-level strategic goals into concrete, measurable activities that teams can execute daily, weekly, and monthly.

Unlike strategic planning, which focuses on long-term direction and competitive positioning, operational planning deals with the practical details of execution. It answers questions like: What specific tasks must be completed? Who is responsible for each task? What resources are required? When must each milestone be achieved? How will we measure progress?

Operational planning creates alignment across the organization, ensuring every department, team, and individual understands their role in achieving broader objectives. It provides the structure and clarity that prevents chaos, wasted resources, and misaligned efforts that plague organizations without disciplined planning processes.

Why Operational Planning Matters

Effective operational planning delivers tangible benefits that directly impact organizational performance and success.

Bridges Strategy and Execution - Most strategies fail not because they're poorly conceived, but because they're poorly executed. Operational planning bridges the gap between strategic intent and practical action, turning abstract goals into concrete work plans that teams can implement.

Improves Resource Allocation - Organizations have finite resources—money, people, time, equipment. Operational planning ensures these scarce resources flow to the highest-priority activities, preventing waste on initiatives that don't support strategic objectives. Without operational planning, resources get allocated reactively or politically rather than strategically.

Creates Accountability - Clear operational plans establish who is responsible for what and by when. This clarity eliminates the ambiguity that allows poor performance to hide. When everyone knows their specific responsibilities and deadlines, accountability becomes objective rather than subjective.

Enables Coordination - Complex organizations require coordination across departments, teams, and individuals. Operational planning identifies dependencies, sequences activities appropriately, and ensures teams work in harmony rather than at cross-purposes. Marketing knows when product development will finish, sales understands when new offerings launch, and operations prepares for increased volume.

Facilitates Adaptation - Paradoxically, good planning makes organizations more agile, not less. Detailed operational plans create baselines against which to measure progress, making deviations visible quickly. This early warning system enables rapid course corrections before minor problems become crises.

Improves Decision-Making - Operational plans provide context for daily decisions. When unexpected opportunities or challenges arise, leaders can evaluate them against established plans, making faster, better-informed choices about whether to pursue new directions or stay the course.

Builds Organizational Capability - The discipline of operational planning develops analytical skills, project management competencies, and strategic thinking throughout the organization. Over time, planning becomes embedded in organizational culture, creating sustainable competitive advantages.

The Operational Planning Process

Effective operational planning follows a structured process that ensures comprehensive, realistic, and actionable plans.

Step 1: Review Strategic Objectives

Operational planning begins with a crystal-clear understanding of strategic objectives. Before diving into tactical details, planners must answer fundamental questions: What are we ultimately trying to achieve? What strategic goals must this operational plan support? What does success look like?

This review involves studying strategic plans, meeting with senior leaders, and ensuring alignment on priorities. If the strategic objective is "increase market share by 5% in the Northeast region," the operational plan must directly support that goal. Without this clarity, operational plans risk becoming busy work disconnected from actual priorities.

Explicitly state strategic objectives at the beginning of your operational plan. This creates a constant reference point that keeps planning grounded in purpose rather than drifting into tactical minutiae divorced from strategic intent.

Step 2: Analyze Current State

Understanding where you are today is essential for planning how to reach tomorrow's objectives. Current state analysis examines resources, capabilities, performance levels, market conditions, and constraints.

Resource Inventory - Document available resources: staff headcount and skills, budget allocations, technology systems, physical assets, and partnerships. Be brutally honest—planning based on the resources you wish you had rather than the ones you actually have guarantees failure.

Performance Baseline - Establish current performance metrics across relevant dimensions. If the goal is improving customer satisfaction, what's the current satisfaction score? If it's increasing production efficiency, what's the current throughput? These baselines enable you to set realistic targets and measure progress.

Capability Assessment - Evaluate organizational capabilities honestly. Can your team actually execute the activities your plan requires? Do you have the expertise, systems, and processes needed? Identifying capability gaps early allows you to address them through training, hiring, or partnerships before they derail execution.

Environmental Scan - Analyze external factors affecting your operations: market conditions, competitor actions, regulatory changes, economic trends, and technological developments. Operational plans that ignore external realities quickly become obsolete.

Constraint Identification - Recognize limiting factors that will constrain your options. Budget limitations, regulatory requirements, capacity constraints, technology dependencies, or talent shortages all shape what's realistically achievable. Acknowledging constraints enables creative problem-solving rather than planning that crashes against immovable obstacles.

Step 3: Define Specific Goals and Objectives

Strategic objectives are often broad and qualitative. Operational planning requires translating them into specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals.

If the strategic objective is "improve customer satisfaction," operational goals might be: "Increase Net Promoter Score from 45 to 55 by Q4," "Reduce average response time to customer inquiries from 24 hours to 4 hours by June," and "Achieve 95% first-contact resolution rate by September."

Each operational goal should clearly support strategic objectives while being concrete enough to guide action and measure progress. Vague goals like "enhance customer experience" provide no actionable direction. Specific goals like "implement live chat support handling 1,000 daily inquiries with under 2-minute wait times by July" tell teams exactly what to achieve.

Set goals at multiple levels: organizational, departmental, team, and individual. This cascade ensures everyone understands how their specific objectives contribute to broader organizational success, creating alignment from the executive suite to the front lines.

Step 4: Identify Required Activities and Tasks

With clear goals established, identify every activity and task required to achieve them. This is where operational planning becomes granular, breaking down goals into executable work.

Use decomposition techniques: break significant goals into major initiatives, initiatives into projects, projects into tasks, and tasks into specific actions. If the goal is launching a new product, major initiatives might include product development, creating a marketing campaign, training the sales team, and setting up distribution channels. Each initiative breaks down further into detailed tasks.

Involve the people who will actually execute the work in this identification process. Front-line employees often have insights into practical requirements that executives miss. Their involvement also builds buy-in and surfaces potential obstacles early.

Document dependencies between activities. Task B might require completion of Task A before it can begin. These dependencies determine sequencing and identify critical path activities that could delay everything if they slip.

For each task, specify what "done" looks like. Clear completion criteria prevent endless debate about whether tasks are finished and ensure consistent quality standards across the organization.

Step 5: Assign Responsibilities and Ownership

Every task, activity, and initiative needs a clear owner—one person ultimately responsible for ensuring it gets done. Notice "one person," not a committee or department. Shared responsibility often means no responsibility.

Use RACI matrices (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) to clarify roles:

• Responsible: Who does the work?

• Accountable: Who ultimately answers for completion?

• Consulted: Who provides input before decisions?

• Informed: Who needs updates on progress?

One person is accountable for each deliverable, though multiple people might be responsible for executing different aspects. This clarity eliminates the confusion that causes tasks to fall through cracks or suffer from too many cooks in the kitchen.

Match responsibilities to capabilities. Assigning tasks to people who lack the necessary skills, authority, or bandwidth sets them up for failure. If capability gaps exist, address them through training, hiring, or reassignment before problems arise.

Document reporting relationships and escalation paths. When obstacles emerge, owners need clear channels for seeking help, escalating issues, or requesting additional resources.

Step 6: Develop Timelines and Schedules

Transform the list of activities into a time-based sequence that shows when things happen and how they fit together.

Create Milestones - Identify major checkpoints marking significant progress. Milestones provide natural points for reviewing progress, celebrating achievements, and making adjustments. They break long planning horizons into manageable segments that maintain momentum and motivation.

Estimate Duration - For each task, estimate how long it will realistically take to complete. Involve people with relevant experience—their estimates will be more accurate than guesses from planners unfamiliar with the work. Build in buffers for unexpected delays, especially for critical path activities where delays cascade through the entire plan.

Sequence Activities - Arrange tasks in logical order respecting dependencies. Some activities must happen sequentially, while others can proceed in parallel. Gantt charts or project management software visualize these relationships, showing which activities can accelerate timelines through parallel execution and which must wait for predecessors.

Set Deadlines - Establish specific completion dates for tasks, milestones, and overall goals. Deadlines create urgency and enable performance measurement. Without them, everything becomes a priority, which means nothing is actually prioritized.

Plan for Contingencies - Identify potential issues and build contingency plans. If a critical vendor fails to deliver, what's the backup plan? If key personnel leave, how will you backfill? Contingency planning prevents crises from derailing entire operational plans.

Step 7: Allocate Resources

Determine what resources each activity requires and ensure they're available when needed.

Budget Allocation - Assign financial resources to specific activities. Be detailed—general budget categories provide insufficient control. Know exactly how much each initiative costs, including direct expenses, labor, technology, and overhead. Track spending against allocations throughout execution to prevent budget overruns.

Staff Assignment - Allocate people to activities based on required skills, availability, and capacity. Avoid overallocating individuals across too many simultaneous responsibilities—this guarantees delays and burnout. If resource conflicts arise (the same person needed for multiple simultaneous tasks), resolve them during planning rather than during execution.

Technology and Tools - Identify required systems, software, equipment, and facilities. Ensure they're available, properly configured, and users are trained. Technology constraints can derail even well-planned initiatives if discovered too late.

External Resources - Plan for vendors, contractors, consultants, or partners if internal resources are insufficient. Include procurement lead times in your schedule—external resources often require longer acquisition processes than internal staff.

Reserves - Hold back 10-20% of resources as reserves for unexpected needs. Perfect forecasting is impossible; reserves provide flexibility to respond to surprises without completely derailing plans.

Step 8: Establish Metrics and KPIs

Define how you'll measure progress and success. Without metrics, you're flying blind, unable to distinguish between success and failure or to make data-driven adjustments.

Outcome Metrics - Measure whether you achieved intended results. If the goal was increasing customer satisfaction, the Net Promoter Score is an outcome metric. These metrics answer "did we succeed?"

Process Metrics - Track execution quality and efficiency. Response times, defect rates, cycle times, and resource utilization reveal whether processes are performing as planned. These metrics answer "are we executing well?"

Leading Indicators - Identify early warning signals predicting future performance. Leading indicators change before outcome metrics, enabling proactive intervention. Website traffic is a leading indicator for sales; application submissions are leading indicators for hiring.

Lagging Indicators - These are outcome metrics that confirm what already happened. Revenue, customer satisfaction scores, and market share are lagging indicators—valuable for assessing success but too late for course correction.

Set Targets - For each metric, establish specific targets representing success. Don't just measure; define what good performance looks like. Targets create accountability and enable objective performance assessment.

Determine Measurement Frequency - Decide how often to measure each metric. Critical metrics might require daily monitoring, while others may only require monthly or quarterly reviews. Match measurement frequency to how quickly things change and how quickly you need to respond.

Step 9: Create Communication Plans

Even brilliant operational plans fail if people don't understand them. Communication planning ensures everyone knows what's happening, why it matters, and what they need to do.

Stakeholder Mapping - Identify everyone affected by or involved in the operational plan: executives, managers, employees, customers, partners, and vendors. Different stakeholders need different information at various frequencies.

Message Development - Craft clear, compelling messages for each stakeholder group. Executives need high-level progress updates and strategic implications. Front-line employees need detailed task assignments and context for why their work matters. Tailor messages to audience needs and perspectives.

Communication Channels - Select appropriate channels for different messages: all-hands meetings for major announcements, team meetings for detailed planning discussions, email updates for routine progress reports, dashboards for real-time metrics, and one-on-one conversations for sensitive topics.

Communication Schedule - Establish regular communication rhythms: weekly team updates, monthly all-hands meetings, quarterly business reviews. Consistent communication cadences build expectations and ensure information flows reliably rather than sporadically.

Feedback Mechanisms - Create channels for people to ask questions, raise concerns, and provide input. Two-way communication reveals problems early and builds engagement by demonstrating that leadership listens to front-line perspectives.

Step 10: Document the Plan

Consolidate all planning elements into clear, accessible documentation that serves as the operational blueprint.

Executive Summary - Provide a concise overview: strategic objectives being supported, key goals, major initiatives, required resources, critical milestones, and success metrics. Executives and external stakeholders need this high-level view without tactical details.

Detailed Plan - Include comprehensive information: complete task lists, responsibility assignments, timelines, resource allocations, dependencies, metrics, and contingency plans. This detailed documentation guides day-to-day execution.

Visual Representations - Use Gantt charts, flowcharts, organizational charts, and dashboards to make complex information digestible. Visual formats often communicate relationships and timelines more effectively than text.

Assumptions and Constraints - Document explicitly the assumptions underlying your plan and constraints limiting your options. When circumstances change, understanding foundational assumptions helps determine whether the plan remains valid or requires revision.

Revision History - Maintain version control showing how the plan evolves. As you make adjustments, document what changed, why, and when. This history prevents confusion about which version is current and provides valuable lessons for future planning cycles.

Accessibility - Store plans where everyone who needs them can access them easily. Cloud-based project management platforms, shared drives, or intranets work well. Plans locked in executives' email inboxes or desk drawers can't guide execution.

Step 11: Gain Approval and Buy-In

Before execution begins, secure formal approval from decision-makers and genuine buy-in from people who must execute the plan.

Present to Stakeholders - Walk key stakeholders through the plan, explaining the rationale, addressing concerns, and incorporating feedback. A presentation allows stakeholders to understand not just what the plan says, but also why those choices were made.

Address Objections - Listen carefully to concerns and objections. Sometimes they reveal flaws in planning that need correction. Other times, they reflect misunderstandings that require clarification. Either way, addressing objections strengthens both the plan and stakeholder commitment.

Secure Resources - Obtain formal commitment of required resources. Verbal promises aren't sufficient—get budget approvals, staff assignments, and technology allocations confirmed in writing. Plans without committed resources are fantasies.

Build Coalition - Identify champions throughout the organization who will advocate for the plan and drive execution. Change agents at multiple levels create momentum that overcomes resistance and maintains energy through inevitable challenges.

Celebrate the Plan - Launching an operational plan is worth celebrating. It represents significant work and organizational commitment. Recognition builds enthusiasm for execution and signals leadership's serious commitment to following through.

Step 12: Execute and Monitor

With planning complete, shift focus to disciplined execution while continuously monitoring progress.

Launch Effectively - Begin execution decisively. Communicate clearly that the plan is now active, people should begin their assigned work, and leadership expects results. Tentative launches invite people to continue business as usual rather than embrace the plan.

Track Progress Continuously - Monitor metrics, milestones, and task completion regularly. Don't wait for monthly reviews to discover critical activities are behind schedule. Real-time or near-real-time tracking enables rapid response to problems.

Hold People Accountable - Follow up consistently on commitments. When deadlines pass without completion, address it immediately. When people consistently deliver, they should be recognized for their performance. Accountability requires consequences—both positive and negative.

Remove Obstacles - Execution inevitably encounters obstacles: resource constraints, unexpected technical problems, changing market conditions, or organizational resistance. Leaders must actively identify and remove these obstacles rather than expecting teams to overcome them on their own.

Maintain Communication - Continue regular communication throughout execution. Update stakeholders on progress, celebrate milestones, acknowledge challenges honestly, and reinforce why the work matters. Communication sustains momentum and engagement.

Conduct Regular Reviews - Schedule periodic reviews (weekly, monthly, quarterly, depending on the planning horizon) to comprehensively assess progress. These reviews examine whether execution is on track, whether goals remain relevant, and whether adjustments are needed.

Step 13: Adjust and Adapt

No plan survives contact with reality unchanged. Effective operational planning includes disciplined processes for making necessary adjustments.

Monitor for Variances - Compare actual performance against planned performance. Variances—positive or negative—require investigation. Why are things different from what was intended? Do variances reflect execution problems, planning errors, or changed circumstances?

Assess Significance - Not every variance requires plan changes. Minor deviations within acceptable tolerances might need attention, but not a plan revision. Significant variances that threaten goal achievement demand more substantial responses.

Identify Root Causes - When significant variances occur, conduct root cause analysis. Superficial solutions that address symptoms rather than causes waste resources and allow problems to persist or worsen.

Make Informed Adjustments - Based on analysis, adjust plans appropriately. This might mean reallocating resources, revising timelines, modifying goals, changing approaches, or even abandoning initiatives that no longer make sense. Adjustment isn't failure—it's an intelligent response to new information.

Communicate Changes - When plans change, communicate adjustments clearly and explain the rationale. People need to understand why plans changed to maintain confidence in leadership decision-making and adapt their own work appropriately.

Document Lessons - Capture insights from both successes and failures throughout execution. These lessons inform future planning cycles, helping the organization improve its planning capabilities over time.

Common Operational Planning Mistakes

Understanding typical pitfalls helps organizations avoid them.

Planning in Isolation - Plans developed by small groups without input from those who will execute them often miss practical realities, underestimate the difficulties, and lack buy-in from those expected to implement them.

Excessive Optimism - Planning based on best-case scenarios sets unrealistic expectations. Effective plans acknowledge likely challenges and build in appropriate buffers and contingencies.

Insufficient Detail - High-level plans that don't break down into specific, actionable tasks leave too much ambiguity about what actually needs to happen, creating confusion and misalignment.

Excessive Detail - Conversely, plans drowning in minutiae become overwhelming and inflexible. The right level of detail depends on organizational maturity, planning horizon, and complexity.

Ignoring Resource Constraints - Plans that require resources you don't have or assume unlimited capacity inevitably fail. Realistic planning acknowledges and works within resource constraints.

Poor Dependency Management - Failing to identify and sequence dependent activities leads to bottlenecks, delays, and wasted resources as people wait for prerequisites to be completed.

Set-and-Forget Mentality - Treating plans as static documents rather than living guides guarantees obsolescence. Circumstances change; plans must adapt accordingly.

Weak Accountability - Plans without clear ownership and performance consequences fail to drive results. People need to know they're responsible and will be held accountable.

Measurement Neglect - Operating without metrics prevents knowing whether you're succeeding, failing, or making progress. What gets measured gets managed.

Communication Failure - Even brilliant plans fail if people don't understand them or their role in execution. Communication isn't optional; it's essential.

Tools and Frameworks for Operational Planning

Various tools and frameworks support effective operational planning.

Gantt Charts - Visual timelines showing tasks, durations, dependencies, and responsible parties. Gantt charts excel at illustrating how activities relate temporally and identifying critical paths.

PERT Charts - Program Evaluation and Review Technique charts map tasks and their dependencies, calculate optimal sequencing, and identify critical paths that determine the overall project duration.

Project Management Software - Platforms like Asana, Monday.com, Microsoft Project, Smartsheet, and Trello digitize operational planning, enabling collaboration, tracking, and real-time updates accessible to distributed teams.

OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) - Framework linking strategic objectives to measurable key results, creating alignment from organizational to individual levels. OKRs emphasize ambitious goals and transparent progress tracking.

Balanced Scorecard - A Strategic planning and management system that translates strategic objectives into specific measures across four perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning/growth.

RACI Matrix - Clarifies roles and responsibilities by categorizing stakeholders as Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, or Informed for each activity, eliminating confusion about ownership.

Critical Path Method - A Project planning technique that identifies the sequence of dependent tasks, determines the minimum project duration, and highlights activities where delays affect overall completion.

Resource Allocation Matrix - Maps resources (people, budget, equipment) against activities, revealing conflicts, overallocation, and gaps requiring resolution.

Risk Register - Documents potential risks, their probability, potential impact, mitigation strategies, and contingency plans, ensuring proactive risk management rather than reactive crisis response.

KPI Dashboards - Visual displays presenting key metrics in real-time or near-real-time, enabling at-a-glance performance assessment and rapid identification of areas requiring attention.

Best Practices for Operational Planning Success

Organizations that consistently excel at operational planning share standard practices.

Involve the Right People - Include diverse perspectives: strategic thinkers who understand objectives, operational experts who know execution realities, and front-line employees with practical insights. This diversity creates more realistic, comprehensive plans.

Balance Detail and Flexibility - Plan in sufficient detail to guide action but maintain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances. Rigid plans become obsolete; vague plans provide insufficient direction.

Link to Strategy Explicitly - Ensure clear, documented connections between operational activities and strategic objectives. This linkage maintains focus on what truly matters and enables informed trade-off decisions.

Start with the End in Mind - Begin planning by envisioning successful completion: What does success look like? What must be true for us to declare victory? Working backward from desired outcomes reveals required activities more effectively than working forward from the current state.

Built-in Learning - Treat operational planning as a capability to develop, not just a task to complete. Conduct after-action reviews, capture lessons, and continuously improve your planning processes.

Use Appropriate Technology - Leverage tools that enhance planning and execution without creating unnecessary complexity. The best tool is the one people will actually use consistently.

Establish Rhythms - Create regular planning, review, and adjustment cycles. Predictable rhythms build planning into organizational culture rather than treating it as occasional events.

Celebrate Milestones - Recognize achievements at key milestones throughout execution. Celebration maintains momentum, reinforces the importance of the work, and builds team cohesion.

Embrace Transparency - Share plans, progress, and challenges broadly. Transparency builds trust, enables coordination, and harnesses collective problem-solving when obstacles emerge.

Plan for Planning - Allocate adequate time and resources to planning itself. Rushing planning to "get to execution faster" produces poor plans that slow execution more than thorough planning ever would.

The Reality of Operational Planning

Operational planning isn't glamorous, and it won't appear in business school case studies about visionary leadership. Yet it's arguably more important than strategy for determining organizational success. The business landscape is littered with brilliant strategies that died in execution and modest strategies that succeeded through disciplined operational planning.

Effective operational planning requires patience for detail, tolerance for complexity, and commitment to follow-through—qualities less celebrated than visionary thinking but ultimately more valuable. It demands balancing competing tensions: detail versus flexibility, short-term versus long-term, competing priorities, and multiple stakeholders with different needs.

Organizations that master operational planning create sustainable competitive advantages. They execute faster, adapt more quickly, use resources more efficiently, and deliver results more consistently than competitors with superior strategies but inferior execution. Over time, this execution excellence compounds, creating gaps that competitors find increasingly difficult to close.

The investment in developing operational planning capabilities pays dividends across every initiative the organization undertakes. Like compound interest, minor improvements in planning effectiveness multiply across dozens or hundreds of initiatives annually, generating enormous aggregate impact.

Operational planning will never be finished—it's a continuous discipline requiring constant attention, refinement, and adaptation. Organizations that embrace this reality and build planning into their cultural DNA position themselves for sustained success regardless of strategic direction or market conditions.

References

1. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Press.

2. Drucker, P. F. (1954). The Practice of Management. Harper & Row.

3. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, 72(1), 107-114.

4. Hrebiniak, L. G. (2005). Making Strategy Work: Leading Effective Execution and Change. Wharton School Publishing.

5. Doerr, J. (2018). Measure What Matters: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation Rock the World with OKRs. Portfolio.

6. Bossidy, L., & Charan, R. (2002). Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done. Crown Business.

7. Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). 7th Edition.

8. Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Free Press.

9. Goldratt, E. M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press.

10. Lencioni, P. (2012). The Advantage: Why Organizational Health Trumps Everything Else in Business. Jossey-Bass.

11. Sull, D., Homkes, R., & Sull, C. (2015). Why strategy execution unravels—and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review, 93(3), 57-66.

12. Niven, P. R., & Lamorte, B. (2016). Objectives and Key Results: Driving Focus, Alignment, and Engagement with OKRs. Wiley.

13. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press.

14. Mankins, M. C., & Steele, R. (2005). Turning great strategy into outstanding performance. Harvard Business Review, 83(7), 64-72.

15. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.

16. Rumelt, R. (2011). Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters. Crown Business.

17. Lafley, A. G., & Martin, R. L. (2013). Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works. Harvard Business Review Press.

18. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make Competition Irrelevant. Harvard Business School Press.

19. Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap, and Others Don't. HarperBusiness.

20. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.